Qualcomm Snapdragon 680: The Snapdragon 680 is not a gaming-focused SoC, but it can still handle most popular games. In our tests, we were able to play PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty: Mobile at high settings without any issues. It has a powerful CPU and GPU that can handle even the most demanding games. MediaTek Helio G96: The G96 is a gaming-focused SoC, and it is designed to provide a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience. Here is a more detailed look at how the two SoCs perform in terms of gaming: One example is Blackview BV8800, a 4G rugged phone with G96 processor and night vision camera. However, in general, both the Helio G96 and the Snapdragon 680 can handle most popular games without any issues. The actual performance of the games will vary depending on the specific game, the settings, and the resolution. These are just a few examples, and there are many other games that can be played on these SoCs. Some of the games that they can handle include: This means that the Snapdragon 680 is slightly faster than the Helio G96 in terms of overall performance.īoth the Helio G96 phone and the Snapdragon 680 phone can handle a variety of popular Android games. In the PCMark Work 2.0 benchmark, the Helio G96 scored 6004 points. This means that the Snapdragon 680 is slightly faster than the Helio G96 in terms of GPU performance. The Snapdragon 680 scored 266 fps in the high-quality preset. In the GFXBench Aztec Ruins benchmark, the Helio G96 scored 241 frames per second (fps) in the high-quality preset. This means that the Snapdragon 680 is slightly faster than the Helio G96 in terms of CPU performance. The Snapdragon 680 scored 591 points in single-core and 1653 points in multi-core. In the Geekbench 5 benchmark, the Helio G96 scored 502 points in single-core and 1545 points in multi-core. We ran some real-world benchmarks on the Helio G96 and the Snapdragon 680 to see how they perform in terms of gaming, web browsing, and other tasks. The Snapdragon 680 supports 4G LTE Cat-11, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, and GPS. In terms of connectivity, the Helio G96 supports 4G LTE Cat-12/13, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, and GPS. This means that the Adreno 610 is expected to be slightly faster than the Mali-G57 MC2, but the difference is likely to be minimal.īoth the Helio G96 and the Snapdragon 680 support LPDDR4x memory up to 1866MHz. The Snapdragon 680 has an Adreno 610 GPU clocked at up to 600MHz. In terms of GPU, the Helio G96 has a Mali-G57 MC2 GPU clocked at up to 950MHz. This means that the Snapdragon 680 has a higher peak CPU clock speed, but the Helio G96 has a more balanced CPU configuration with a mix of high-performance and high-efficiency cores. The Snapdragon 680 also has an octa-core configuration, but with four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 2.4GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 1.8GHz. In terms of CPU, the Helio G96 has an octa-core configuration with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.05GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at up to 2GHz. This means that the Snapdragon 680 is expected to be more power efficient than the Helio G96. The Helio G96 is manufactured using a 12nm FinFET process, while the Snapdragon 680 is manufactured using a more advanced 6nm process. We will also look at some real-world benchmarks to see how they perform in terms of gaming, web browsing, and other tasks. In this comparison post, we will take a closer look at the Helio G96 and the Snapdragon 680, and compare their key specifications and features. Both chips offer a good balance of performance and power efficiency, making them ideal for a variety of mobile devices, such as smartphones tablets, and laptops. The MediaTek Helio G96 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 are two mid-range mobile SoCs that were released in 20, respectively.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |